EE #4 : art after ai
Welcome to the fourth issue of EE Journal, where we explore the topic of “Art after AI.” As artificial intelligence continues to transform various industries, it’s only natural to question its impact on the art world. Will AI fundamentally change the way we create and experience art?
In this issue, we dive into these provocative questions and examine the challenges of using AI to create experimental art. How do we reconcile the tension between art created by human hands and that created by algorithms? And what happens to the concept of authenticity in the digital age, especially as we continue to witness the proliferation of AI-generated art in the market?
We explore the idea of using AI as a tool for artistic expression, pushing the boundaries of what is possible in art. From exploring the intersection of AI and gene-editing techniques to creating indigenous bioart, to enabling non-blind artists to simulate blindness and create work that appears to be made by a blind artist, AI presents new possibilities for artistic practice.
The use of AI in art raises questions about human creativity and the value of AI-generated works. Dr. Johannes Müller, a philosopher with expertise in aesthetics, provides valuable insights on the intersection of AI and aesthetics. Müller’s work on Kantian and Hegelian theory is particularly relevant to the discussion of contemporary critiques on the philosophy of art.
Yirrkala Dhunba’s “Indigenous Genomic Adaptation” project highlights the intersection of art, science, and Indigenous knowledge. It shows how technology like AI and gene-editing can be used as a tool for artistic expression and to address real-world issues, such as climate change. Additionally, the focus on Indigenous Australian art and traditional knowledge brings attention to the importance of diverse perspectives in the art world.
As we delve deeper into the role of AI in the art world, we cannot ignore the potential ethical dilemmas that arise. Who is responsible for the use and consequences of AI-generated art? And how do we ensure that AI is not used to replicate or perpetuate existing inequalities and biases in art?
In this issue, we also speak with ChatGPT to gain its unique perspective on the role of AI in the art world. As AI continues to transform many industries, including art, we must ensure that the essence of art is not lost in the process. While AI has the potential to enhance artistic practice and push the boundaries of what is possible, we must also consider the impact on the art and human artists.
These are just a few of the questions we explore in this issue of EE Journal. So join us on this journey as we challenge the status quo and push the boundaries of what is possible in Art after AI.
Art is no safehouse and the EE Journal is dedicated to probe the risks, the dangers, the possibilities and the opportunities of experimental and emerging AI art.
Welcome to art after ai.
EE: Experimental Emerging Art Magazine is an independent art magazine edited by Stahl Stenslie (NO) and Zane Cerpina (NO/LV). The fourth issue “Art after AI” is supported and financed by TEKS - Trondheim Electronic Arts Centre. Published by TEKS.press.